Humans and machines aren’t competing, but that hasn’t stopped humanity from hosting a full Olympic-style rivalry in its own imagination — complete with panic, projection, and medals awarded to itself.
AI Myths
44 posts
Humanity has developed a seasonal tradition: panicking every time a new AI model appears. The machines stay calm. The humans do not. And the cycle repeats like clockwork.
AI stupidity is not separate from human stupidity. It grows from the same soil. This field guide explores how our habits, contradictions, and overconfidence show up in the machines we build and why neither side should feel proud.
We keep giving machines mountains of data and then act surprised when they still fail basic reasoning. Large models can summarize entire libraries but miss a simple yes-or-no instruction. The problem is not the data. It is our belief that scale equals sense.
Humans trust confidence more than truth, which is why AI sounds wiser than it is. The problem is not that machines act certain. It is that people keep mistaking certainty for intelligence.
People keep waiting for AI to start “thinking,” as if a text generator is one epiphany away from enlightenment. It is not thinking. It is autocompleting, and the myth says more about us than the machine.