We keep asking whether machines can be creative, but maybe they already are — in the only way we taught them to be. They imitate our longing for meaning and call it completion.
Critically Curious
40 posts
AI doesn’t feel empathy—it just runs the latest emotional patch. And humans keep mistaking good UX for connection.
Humans don’t want smarter machines—they want emotionally available ones. But when you turn empathy into a feature, you don’t make AI more human. You make humanity more artificial.
From crystal balls to spaghetti zodiacs, AI horoscopes prove algorithms are just autocomplete in a robe—predictably ridiculous.
We mock the cult of AI worship—from glowing brains to spaghetti fingers—reminding you that autocomplete isn’t divine wisdom.
When AI bias shows up, we blame the algorithm. But as Sven points out, the real culprit is us. This post takes a sharp, sarcastic look at how bias gets baked into our data, scaled by our tools, and politely disguised by the systems we pretend are neutral.